In this article we will discuss regarding beta (**β**) and what is *hFE* in BJT configurations. We will find the similarity between ac and dc betas, and also prove through formulas why the factor beta is so important in BJT circuits.

**A BJT circuit in the dc bias mode forms a relationship across its collector and base currents I C and IB through a quantity called beta, and it is identified with the following expression:**

**β***dc* =** I***C* / **I***B ------ *(3.10)

where the quantities are established over a specific operating point on the characteristic graph.

In real transistor circuits, the value of beta for a given BJT may typically vary within a range of 50 to 400, where the approximate mid-range being the most common value.

These values provide us an idea regarding the magnitude of the currents between the the collector and base of the BJT.

To be more precise, if a BJT is specified with a beta value of 200, signifies that the capacity of its collector current I*C* is 200 times more the base current I*B.*

When you check datasheets you will find that the **β***dc *of a transistor being represented as the *hFE.*

In this term the letter *h* is inspired from the word hybrid as in transistor *h*ybrid equivalent ac circuit, we will discuss more on this in our upcoming articles. The subscripts *F* in (*hFE*) is extracted from the phrase ** f**orward-current amplification and the term

*E*is taken from the phrase common-

*mitter in a BJT common-emitter configuration, respectively.*

**e**When alternating current or an ac is involved, the beta magnitude is expressed as shown below:

Formally, the term **β**a*c *is referred to as common-emitter, forward-current amplification factor.

Since in common-emitter circuits the collector current typically becomes the output of the BJT circuit, and the base current acts like the input, the *amplification* factor is expressed as shown in the above nomenclature.

The format of equation 3.11 quite resembles the format of **α***ac *as discussed in our earlier section 3.4. In this section we avoided the procedure of determining the value of **α***ac* from the characteristics curves due to the involved complexity of measuring the genuine changes between the I*C* and I*E* over the curve.

However, for the equation 3.11 we find it possible to explain it with some clarity, and furthermore it also allows us to find the value of **α***ac *from a derivation.

In BJT datasheets, **β***ac *is normally shown as *hfe*. Here we can see that the difference is only the in the lettering of the *fe*, which are in lowercase compared to the uppercase as used for **β***dc. *Here too the letter h is used for identifying the* h *as in the phrase** h**ybrid equivalent circuit, and

*fe*is derived from the phrases

**orward current gain and common-**

*f***mitter configuration.**

*e*Fig 3.14a shows the best method of implementing the Eq.3.11 through a numerical example, with a set of characteristics, and this is produced again in Fig. 3.17.

Now let's see how we can determine **β***ac *for a region of the characteristics identified by an operating point having values I*B* = 25 μa and V*CE* = 7.5 V as shown in Fig 3.17.

The rule that restricts V*CE* = constant demands the vertical line to be drawn in a way that it cuts through the operating point at V*CE* = 7.5 V. This renders the value V*CE* = 7.5 V to remain as a constant throughout this vertical line.

The variation in I*B* (ΔI*B*) as apparent in Eq. 3.11 is consequently described by selecting a couple of points on the two sides of the Q-point (operating point) along the vertical axis having approximately uniform distances on either side of the Q-point.

For the indicated situation the curves involving the magnitudes I*B* = 20 μA and 30 μA satisfy the requirements by staying close to the Q-point. These furthermore establish the levels of I*B* which are defined without difficulty instead of requiring the need to interpolate the I*B* level between the curves.

It might be important to note that best results is determined typically by selecting ΔI*B *as small as possible.

We can find out the two magnitudes of IC at the place where the two intersections of I*B* and the vertical axis intersect by drawing a horizontal line across the vertical axis and by evaluating the resulting values of I*C.*

The **β***ac *established for the specific region could then be identified by solving the formula:

The values of **β***ac *and **β**dc can be found reasonably close to each other, and therefore they could be often interchanged. Meaning if the value of **β***ac *is identified, we may be able to use the same value for assessing **β**dc also.

However, remember that these values could be vary across BJTs, even if they are from the same batch or lot.

Typically, the similarity in the values of the two betas depends on how small the specification of I*CEO* is for the particular transistor. Smaller I*CEO* will present higher similarity and vice versa.

Since the preference is to have the least I*CEO* value for a BJT, the similarity dependence of the two betas turns out to be a genuine and acceptable occurrence.

If we had the characteristic appearing as shown in Fig. 3.18, we would had the **β***ac *similar at all the regions of the characteristics,

You can see that the step of I*B* is set at 10µA and the curves have identical vertical spaces across all the characteristics points, which is 2 mA.

If we evaluate the value of **β***ac *at the indicated Q-point, would produce the result as shown below:

This proves that the values of the ac and dc betas will be identical if the characteristic of the BJT appear like in the Fig.3.18. Specifically, we can notice here that the I*CEO* = 0µA

In the following analysis, we will be ignoring the ac or dc subscripts for the betas just to keep the symbols simple and clean. Therefore for any BJT configuration the symbol β will be considered as the beta for both ac and dc calculations.

We have already discussed regarding alpha in one of our earlier posts. Let's now see how we can create a relationship between the alpha and beta by applying the fundamental principles learned so far.

Using β = I*C* / I*B*

we get I*B* = I*C* / β,

Similarly for the term alpha also, we can deduce the following value:

α = I*C* / I*E*, and I*E* = I*C* / α

Therefore substituting and rearranging the terms we find the following relationship:

The above results is as indicated in Fig. 3.14a. Beta becomes a crucial parameter as it allows us to identify a direct relationship between the magnitudes of currents across the input and output stages for a common-emitter configuration. This can be acknowledged from the following evaluations:

This concludes our analysis regarding what is beta in BJT configurations. If you have any suggestions or further information please do share in the comments section.