In a few of my earlier posts we comprehensively studied regarding how SMPS buck and boost converters work, and we also deduced a few fundamental formulas for evaluating the important parameters like voltage, current and inductance in these converter circuits.

You may want to summarize the details from the following articles, before embarking on the present article which deals with the inductor designing methods.

For calculating inductors in buck boost SMPS circuits, we could derive the following two concluding formulas for a buck converter and for a boost converter respectively:

Vo = DVin ---------- For Buck Converter

Here D = Duty Cycle, which is = Transistor ON time / ON + OFF time of each PWM cycle

Vo = Output Voltage from the converter

Vin = Input supply voltage to the converter

From the above derived formulas, we can understand that the 3 basic parameters which can be used for dimensioning the output in an SMPS based circuit are:

1) The Duty cycle

2) The Transistor ON/OFF time

3) And the Input Voltage level.

This implies that by appropriately adjusting any one of the above parameters it becomes possible to tailor the output voltage from the converter. This adjustment could be implemented manually or automatically through a self adjusting PWM circuit.

Although the above formulas clearly explain how to optimize the output voltage from a buck or boost converter, we still do not know how the inductor can be built for getting an optimal response in these circuits.

You may find many elaborate and researched formulas for settling this issue, however no new hobbyist or any electronic enthusiast would be interested to actually struggle with these complex formulas for the required values, which could actually have more possibility of providing erroneous results due to their complexities.

The better and more effective idea is to "calculate" the inductor value with an experimental set up and through some practical trial and error process.

A simple IC 555 based boost and buck converter designs are shown below which could be used for determining the best possible inductor value for a particular SMPS boost converter circuit.

**The inductor L may be initially made arbitrarily. The rule of the thumb is to use the number of turns slightly higher than the supply voltage, therefore if the supply voltage is 12V, the number of turns could be around 15 turns. **

**It must be wound over a suitable ferrite core, that could be a ferrite ring or a ferrite rod, or over an EE core assembly.**

**The thickness of the wire is determined by the amp requirement which initially won't be a relevant parameter, therefore any relatively thin copper enameled wire would work, may be around 25 SWG. Later on as per the current specs of the intended design, more number of wires could be added in parallel to the inductor while winding it in order to make it compatible with the specified ampere rating.**

**The diameter of the inductor will depend on the frequency, higher frequency would allow smaller diameters and vice versa. To be more precise, the inductance offered by the inductor becomes higher as frequency is increased, therefore this parameter will need to be confirmed through a separate test using the same IC 555 set up.**

The above set up shows a basic IC 555 PWM circuit, which is equipped with separate potentiometers for enabling an adjustable frequency, and an adjustable PWM output at its pin#3.

Pin#3 can be seen connected to a standard boost converter configuration using the TIP122 transistor the inductor L, the diode BA159 and a capacitor C.

The transistor BC547 is introduced to limit the current across the TIP122 so that during the adjustment process when the pots are being tweaked the TIP122 is never allowed to cross the breakdown point, thus the BC547 safeguards the TIP122 from excessive current and makes the procedure safe and foolproof for the user.

The output voltage or the boost voltage is monitored across C for a maximum optimal response during the entire testing process.

Initially, the PWM pot is set to produce the narrowest possible PWM at pin#3, and the frequency is adjusted to about 20kHz.

A digital multimeter fixed over above 100V DC range is connected across C with correct polarity.

Next, the PWM pot is gradually adjusted and monitored as long as the voltage across C is rising. The moment the voltage is seen dropping, the adjustment is returned to the position which yielded the highest possible voltage on the pot, and this position is fixed as the optimal point for the selected inductor.

After this, the frequency pot is similarly tweaked for further optimizing the voltage level across C, and set at the most effective frequency point, for the selected inductor.

For acquiring the duty cycle one could possibly check the PWM pot resistance ratio, which would be directly proportional to the mark space ratio of the pin#3 output duty cycle.

The frequency value could be learned through a frequency meter or by using the frequency range across the given DMM if it has the facility, this could be checked at pin#3 of the IC.

Your inductor parameters are now determined and could be used for any boost converter for the best optimal response.

The current spec of the inductor could be increased by simply using many parallel wires while winding it, say for example you could use around 5 nos of 26SWG wires in parallel for empowering the inductor to handle 5amps of current. and so on.

The next diagram shows the process of optimizing and calculating inductors in SMPS, for a buck converter application.

The same process applies for this set up too, as was done with the above explained boost converter design.

As can be seen the output stage is now altered with a buck converter set up, the transistors are now replaced with PNP types and the positions of the inductor, diode changed appropriately.

Thus, by using the above two methods anybody can determine or calculate inductors in buck boost smps circuits without using complex and unfeasible formulas.

Have questions? Please feel free to post them through comments! Comments will be moderated and solved ASAP.Thank u mr swagatam i understand the principle better it is a trial and error thing I will do and let u know sir . Thank u Alex

sure Mr. Alex, ……it's not quite a trial and error method, because here you are able to monitor the results while optimizing it.

Thanks sir . I understand .

Sir . I made a buck convertor that drive a high voltage dc to convert 300v dv to 150 v dc . The pwm signal used 31 khz from ardino . But my out put is 28v only . Where is my mistake . ???

Naseef, the voltage level from a buck converter primarily depends on the number of turns of the coil or the inductance value and the PWM “ON time”…make sure these parameters are correctly calculated for the required 150V output

Sir

But my IGBT (25N120) only get 20 to 30 volt on emitter if giving 300v on collector . Inspate of Gate voltage is nearly 10v .

My pwm is 50 % ON time

naseef, the emitter voltage will be equal to the gate level, therefore the gate should be higher than the required output voltage…in your case it must be 150 + 2V.

configure the IGBT stage as done in this article

https://www.homemade-circuits.com/2015/05/5v-pwm-solar-battery-charger-circuit.html

Sir . Eny alternate method for switching my IGBT with low voltage from optocoupler

naseef, the emitter voltage will be almost equal to the gate voltage, so for example if you feed 2V at gate, the emitter will be also at around this level. I hope you have understood the theory.

Sir

What happend when the indectence value is smaller than specifaid indectence of buck convertor . Is it effect the out put voltage of bucknconvertor ?

The indectence value is directly or indirectly propotional to out put voltage of buck convertor .

Kiran, smaller than the required level will cause heating up of the coil and the driver transistor.

Inductor value in inversely proportional to current output.